The purpose of the Pennsylvania Women's Campaign Fund shall be to raise money
for and support through other means progressive women candidates for Pennsylvania
General Assembly, regardless of party affiliation, who have:
demonstrated a recognition
of the concerns of women of all ages, races, ethnic groups and socio-economic
classes;
demonstrated a commitment
to equality in employment opportunities and compensation, eliminating
discrimination and eliminating sexual harassment in the
workplace;
demonstrated a commitment
to parity between women and men in educational and training opportunities,
including programs to help girls reach their full potential;
supported the right
of all women to safe, legal and accessible abortions, comprehensive reproductive
health services, and family planning services;
supported equality for
women with respect to health care issues;
supported the rights
of women in various forms of the family, such as nuclear, extended, same-sex,
and single-parent families; and
demonstrated a commitment
to building a more just society by supporting legislative initiatives that
advance the above interests.
PWCF: A 22 Year Perspective
Top
By Nancy M. Neuman, Former PWCF President
(written in 2004)
When PWCF was founded in February 1982, the deadline to ratify the federal
Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) was looming. It expired on June 30 and ERA fell
three states short of the number needed to ratify. Women like me, who actively
campaigned in unratified states, witnessed the betrayals of two, three, and
four male legislators who switched their votes at the last minute after promising
to vote yes. Like other ERA advocates I believed that progressive women
legislators would have kept their promises, unlike the men who were quite
willing to trade off the ERA for better committee assignments or highway
money.
So I was ready to sign up when PWCF was founded. PWCF also convinced me I
could do something about the backlash against the legal right to abortion
established by the US Supreme Court in 1973. Pennsylvania legislators passed
the Abortion Control
Act in 1982, which was overturned by the US Supreme Court in
1986 (Thornburgh vs. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists).
The Court found that the informed consent provisions imposed
upon the woman were nothing less than an outright attempt to wedge
the Commonwealths message discouraging abortion into the privacy of
the
dialogue between the woman and her physician.
PWCF was founded in this political environment with a purpose to raise money
for women candidates of all political parties who subscribe to the principles
of equality embodied in the ERA, are pro-choice, and are progressive on other
social issues.
In its first election, PWCF endorsed a Republican challenger to anti-choice
Rep. Stephen Freind of Haverford in the primary, but she lost. Freind was
infamous for his astonishing statement, later retracted, that a woman who
is raped cannot become pregnant because her body creates antibodies against
sperm. Two PWCF endorsed House candidates won in 1982: Ruth Rudy (D-Centre)
who beat an anti-choice incumbent, and Ruth Harper (D-Philadelphia) who was
first elected in 1976. PWCF endorsed Senator Jeanette Reibman (D-Northampton)
who won re-election and House candidate Babette Josephs (D-Philadelphia)
who lost, but came back to win in 1984. In 1984 the late Roxanne Jones
(D-Philadelphia) beat an incumbent to became the second female Senator. She
often said that PWCFs endorsement gave her campaign the credibility
it needed to build momentum.
PWCF supports progressive women candidates regardless of party affiliation,
a stance that is not without controversy. Republican Alma Jacobs, a founding
board member, learned that first hand when nine Republican women in the House
accused her of disloyalty. According to the Delaware Times of March 19, 1982,
Jacobs was the center of a growing storm
because she is on the
board of the new PWCF [which] has endorsed two Democrats and a challenger
to Republican incumbent Representative Steven Friend.
PWCF has always focused its efforts on General Assembly candidates because
Pennsylvania lags most states in the proportion of women legislators. In
1982 women were 4% of the legislature compared to 12% nationwide. Jeanette
Reibman (D-Northampton) was the only state Senator, with 11 women serving
in the House. The 1990 election produced the biggest increase when the percentage
of women rose from 6.7% to 9.5%. Although a record number of women ran in
1992, few of them won. By 2002 the percentage of women legislators was 13.8%
with 8 Senators and 27 House members. In 1982 the Center for American Women
and Politics (CAWP) ranked Pennsylvania 45th of the 50 states. In 2002 our
ranking is 44th because by comparison to other states our gains are slow,
even if they are steady.
By our 10th anniversary, the PWCF board understood that we cannot dramatically
change the makeup of the General Assembly in one or two elections, but must
work patiently to ensure the re-election of our incumbents and elect a few
new legislators in each cycle who will become incumbents on the next round.
In 1997 PWCF started a Campaign School, which is hands-on boot camp for
progressive women candidates and those who are exploring a candidacy. Our
third school took place in 2001. Graduates leave the School armed with strategy,
budgets, staffing methods, and improved fundraising techniques.
Political change over 20 years has made clear that nobody can take for granted
public policies that seem to have been settled, such as a womans right
to legal abortion. We need to encourage progressive women to become candidates
and back them up with significant sums of money so they can compete and win.
In the long run their success will not only make the legislature more
representative, their participation will also improve the lives of women
and their families throughout the Commonwealth. |